header-logo header-logo

A common problem

30 March 2007 / Laurie Toczek
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Should old cases be judged on new common law? Laurie Toczek reports

On 13 February 2007, an interview with Professor Graham Zellick, the Chairman of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), app­eared in the Times. Professor Zellick referred to the recent case of R (Director of Revenue and Customs Prosecutions) v Criminal Cases Review Commission [2006] EWCA 3064 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 48 (Dec). One of the questions raised by this case is whether old cases should be judged on ‘new’ common law, as it now is, or as it was when the conviction occurred.

The most famous case in which this issue arose is R v Bentley [1998] EWCA Crim 2516, [1999] Crim LR 330. On the evening of 2 November 1952, Derek Bentley and Christopher Craig climbed onto the roof of a warehouse in Croydon intending to commit a burglary. They were seen and the police were called. One of the officers who attended the scene, PC Sidney Miles, was shot and killed by Craig. Craig was charged with murder. Bentley

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll