header-logo header-logo

A common problem

30 March 2007 / Laurie Toczek
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Should old cases be judged on new common law? Laurie Toczek reports

On 13 February 2007, an interview with Professor Graham Zellick, the Chairman of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), app­eared in the Times. Professor Zellick referred to the recent case of R (Director of Revenue and Customs Prosecutions) v Criminal Cases Review Commission [2006] EWCA 3064 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 48 (Dec). One of the questions raised by this case is whether old cases should be judged on ‘new’ common law, as it now is, or as it was when the conviction occurred.

The most famous case in which this issue arose is R v Bentley [1998] EWCA Crim 2516, [1999] Crim LR 330. On the evening of 2 November 1952, Derek Bentley and Christopher Craig climbed onto the roof of a warehouse in Croydon intending to commit a burglary. They were seen and the police were called. One of the officers who attended the scene, PC Sidney Miles, was shot and killed by Craig. Craig was charged with murder. Bentley

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll