header-logo header-logo

30 March 2007 / Laurie Toczek
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

A common problem

Should old cases be judged on new common law? Laurie Toczek reports

On 13 February 2007, an interview with Professor Graham Zellick, the Chairman of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), app­eared in the Times. Professor Zellick referred to the recent case of R (Director of Revenue and Customs Prosecutions) v Criminal Cases Review Commission [2006] EWCA 3064 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 48 (Dec). One of the questions raised by this case is whether old cases should be judged on ‘new’ common law, as it now is, or as it was when the conviction occurred.

The most famous case in which this issue arose is R v Bentley [1998] EWCA Crim 2516, [1999] Crim LR 330. On the evening of 2 November 1952, Derek Bentley and Christopher Craig climbed onto the roof of a warehouse in Croydon intending to commit a burglary. They were seen and the police were called. One of the officers who attended the scene, PC Sidney Miles, was shot and killed by Craig. Craig was charged with murder. Bentley

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll