header-logo header-logo

Commercial courts break records

28 April 2021
Issue: 7930 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial , Brexit
printer mail-detail
47% more judgments handed down than previous year

London’s commercial courts have displayed robust health through the challenges of COVID-19 and Brexit, working through a record-breaking caseload in the 12 months up to 30 March.

According to the annual Commercial Court Report by Portland Communications, published this week, the courts handed down more judgments (292 in total, 47% more than the previous year), with more nationalities represented (75) and litigants appearing (1,336) than ever before. This meant the courts recovered from a dip in activity last year and re-established a six-year-long trend for growth.

Nine out of ten of the judgments were for hearings held during these 12 months, showing the increase was not due to a backlog of cases.

Half of the litigants were from outside the UK. The decline in proportion of EU27 litigants since Brexit has continued, reaching a six-year low of only 11.5% of the total.

The report notes: ‘While this decline may be attributed to the fallout from Brexit, it also corresponds with the establishment of international commercial courts across the EU, including in France, Germany and the Netherlands.

‘With the added uncertainties around enforcement, there is perhaps a growing risk that European litigants may choose to settle their disputes closer to home.’

However, the decrease in EU litigants was offset by an increase in other foreign litigants, with Russia providing the highest number, followed by the US (the numbers from the US rose by 75%). Russian litigants most frequently found themselves in court against Ukrainian opponents.

Writing in the report, Professor Alex Mills of UCL points out that judgments in proceedings brought before 1 January 2021 continue to benefit from EU recognition and enforcement regimes; therefore it is too soon to tell whether potential difficulties in enforcing English judgments might lead parties to litigate elsewhere or to choose arbitration instead.

Meanwhile, other courts—most notably the criminal and family courts—continue to suffer lengthy backlogs and delays. Last week, ministers pledged to remove the limit on the number of judicial sitting days to tackle the backlog. Welcoming the decision, Bar Council chair Derek Sweeting QC called for sufficient staff and resources to be provided to support the rise in cases.

Issue: 7930 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll