header-logo header-logo

Commercial battleground tests sporting prowess

16 September 2009
Categories: Legal News , Company , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The investigation by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) into allegations of price fixing between two of the UK’s major sports retailers could have serious implications for the commercial market.

The investigation follows a referral from the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). The OFT acted following an approached in January this year by retailer JJB. The company contacted the OFT with a view to immunity for material relating to “a suspected agreement or concerted practice to dampen competition in the sports retail market in the period from 8 June 2007 to 25 March 2009”. That period relates to that served by JJB’s former chief executive Christopher Ronnie who was fired after alleged gross misconduct.
           
In 2003, the OFT imposed a record fine of £19m on a number of sports retailers, including JJB, after the controller of Sports Direct, Mike Ashley, turned whistleblower. That investigation related to fixing the price of replica England and Manchester United shirts. The current investigation by the SFO is thought to centre on fixing the prices of tennis and squash balls.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll