header-logo header-logo

Coming to terms

13 October 2011 / Caroline Kehoe
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Caroline Kehoe deciphers the meaning of “reasonable endeavours” & “good faith”

Where it is not appropriate to impose an absolute contractual obligation two terms frequently bandied about during negotiations are “reasonable endeavours” and “good faith” but a good deal of uncertainty remains as to what each means in practice.

Endeavours clauses

Before agreeing to any particular terminology it is important to know what the obligation you are committing to really means—what would amount to a breach? The wealth of case law gives some insight but ultimately each case depends on its own facts. In the most recent case, Jet2.Com Limited v Blackpool Airport Limited [2011] EWHC 1529, [2011] All ER (D) 06 (Jul), Mackie J said: “The meaning of the expression remains a question of construction not of extrapolation from other cases…the expression will not always mean the same thing.”

The lowest hurdle

A “reasonable endeavours” clause is defined by reference to an objective standard of what an ordinary competent person might do in the same circumstances (The Talisman [1989] 1 Lloyd’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll