header-logo header-logo

Come together

07 July 2011 / Wouter Goedkoop
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Wouter Goedkoop examines the smart choices in document sharing technology

Changes in regulation such as the Legal Services Act and the Jackson Review mean that UK law firms are re-examining the way in which they work with clients. Collaboration and transparency are fast becoming the watchwords of the legal services industry, but organisations on both sides of the equation are beginning to learn that while they have no choice but to work more closely together, a new set of risks is emerging around the technology that they use to share and work on documents.

Close collaboration takes place across all legal procedures, particularly within financial activities such as inital public offerings (IPOs) and mergers and acquisitions (M&As). Documents such as information memoranda and prospectuses need to be worked on by a range of stakeholders, including bankers, lawyers, executive directors and communications specialists. The traditional approach to drafting those documents has always been to share paper or electronic documents, with all of the formatting, version control and last minute redrafting that goes with them.

Apart

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll