header-logo header-logo

A collaborative approach

17 April 2014 / Clive Freedman KC
Issue: 7603 / Categories: barrister , Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Clive Freedman QC explains how teamwork underpins the foundations of a successful cross-examination

Lawyer, legislator and US Attorney General Benjamin Butler was regarded as one of the most skilled cross-examiners of his day. A particular case, turning on the capabilities of iron, led him to spend a week quite literally at the grindstone working in a railway repair workshop. When it comes to cross-examination, the metaphor of thinking outside the box assumes an altogether new meaning.

The popular portrayal of a witness crumbling and confessing tearfully all under the scrutiny of the barrister’s wit and masterful advocacy is, unfortunately, the stuff of fiction. Witnesses can be backed into a corner, but presentation in court is only part of the story. It is a common misconception that cross-examination is exclusively the barrister’s domain. It is important not to overlook the crucial ways in which solicitor and client can help prepare. Barrister, solicitor and client are members of a team bringing to it valuable and different perspectives.

Solicitors possess an unrivalled knowledge of the case.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll