header-logo header-logo

Collaboration aggravation

02 March 2018 / Jonathan Cornthwaite
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail
nlj_7783_cornthwaite

Jonathan Cornthwaite navigates through the minefield that is copyright disputes

  • Drawing the line between the rights of those who contribute —in different ways, and in different degrees—to the making of a copyright work.

If you were to embark upon writing a novel, it is rather unlikely that you would invite anyone else to join you in the task. But in many other areas of creative activity, collaboration between two or more participants is very normal. And, furthermore, it can be hugely fruitful: in the field of popular song alone, for example, one thinks of George and Ira Gershwin, Rodgers and Hammerstein, Elton John and Bernie Taupin …and of course Lennon and McCartney.

But if collaboration can often be very beneficial from a creative standpoint, it can be an absolute minefield from the legal perspective. Indeed, one of the highest-profile copyright wrangles to have perplexed the English courts in recent years was on the subject of the respective rights of those who contributed to the composition of A Whiter Shade of Pale, one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll