header-logo header-logo

18 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

CMC e-bundle success

Paper-free technology  “saves money & reduces court days”

Electronic bundling and making use of cloud technology can save money and reduce delays in court, initial reports show.

In a recent case in the Mercantile Court at Birmingham HHJ Simon Brown used his powers under the overriding objective to request that his judge’s bundles were presented electronically with “no requirement for paper on the bench”. 

This “secure cloud-based approach” means that all parties can access e-bundles using their own devices, ranging from laptops to iPads and mobile phones. 

E-bundling specialist Paul Sachs says the technology offers large cost savings for the client, and considerable “de-stressing” of the bundle preparation process for the solicitors involved: “Experience shows that combining bundle preparation in the cloud with secure collaboration between parties can remove many of the traditional costs of preparing the bundle and is also leading to earlier settlement. In particular, local authorities have seen an increase in the number of early ‘suitable pleas’, which is contributing to a decrease in the number of court days when e-bundling has been used.” 

Sachs, managing director of Netmaster Solutions, which supplies the CaseLines Electronic Bundle system, adds: “Our service can put together a case management conference e-bundle and deliver it to all parties in a matter of minutes. And it can be reviewed, updated and commented upon over a secure internet connection.”

Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll