header-logo header-logo

19 November 2025
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Legal News , Landlord&tenant , Property , Housing , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Clock starts on countdown to renting revolution

Property lawyers have urged landlords to act quickly if they are considering regaining possession of their properties, ahead of major reforms to the private rental sector

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 comes into force on 1 May 2026, ending fixed-term assured shorthold tenancies and abolishing section 21 ‘no fault’ possession—removing the fear landlords will evict if tenants complain about poor conditions. Instead, tenants will be able to give two months’ notice.

Esther Woolford, partner, and Sophie Kemp, associate, Clarke Willmott, said landlords can continue to serve section 21 notices until 1 May but time limits will apply, meaning most possession proceedings will have to be commenced within three months.

They advised landlords considering eviction to ‘act promptly.

‘Serving a section 21 notice now ensures that you can take advantage of the current regime and avoid being caught out by the new restrictions once the Act is fully in force’.

The Act creates a mandatory database for landlords and a Tenants’ Complaints Ombudsman, sets limits on rent increases and down-payments and prevents landlords from accepting offers above the advertised rent.

It will be illegal for landlords to discriminate against potential tenants on the basis they have children or claim benefits, and they will not be able to unreasonably refuse requests to keep pets. The Decent Homes Standard and ‘Awaab’s Law’, requiring timely action to tackle serious hazards such as dangerous levels of mould, will apply to the private rental sector.

Farriah Shams, associate, Hunters Law, said the Act’s success would depend on ‘balancing tenant protections with landlords’ confidence to continue offering homes for rent’.

The end of section 21 was ‘a significant step towards giving renters greater housing security,’ she said.

‘However, the reform is also controversial as the new rules could reduce rental supply or increase costs for renters.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll