header-logo header-logo

26 April 2023
Issue: 8022 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Environment , ESG
printer mail-detail

Climate guidance for solicitors issued

Law firms should be alert to ‘greenwashing’ risks, and should not describe themselves as ‘sustainable’ unless partners are confident this claim can stand up to external scrutiny.

When presented with a new instruction, solicitors should consider whether climate legal risks may be material to their advice. And reasonably competent solicitors should be aware of the impact and relevance of climate change to their practice area and be able to advise clients accordingly.

Solicitors can choose to decline work that conflicts with their values on climate change.

Moreover, in order to obtain professional indemnity insurance in future, law firms may be asked to demonstrate how they are equipping themselves to advise on climate legal risks and to identify when they are not competent to advise.

The above is included in the Law Society’s ‘Guidance on the impact of climate change on solicitors’, issued last week.

The guidance is in two parts. Part A covers how organisations should manage their business in a manner consistent with the transition to net zero. Part B provides guidance on how climate change physical risks and climate legal risks may be relevant to client advice.

Caroline May, chair of the Law Society’s climate change working group, said the group believed the guidance was the first of its kind for the solicitors’ profession anywhere in the world.

Lisa McClory, a solicitor specialising in technology and sustainability and director at Fractal Legal, said: ‘The list of areas where solicitors should advise their clients is quite extensive, and all practitioners will have to take this seriously in order to stay up to date with climate science.

‘It would be helpful to see some formal guidance from regulators on the extent of solicitors' professional duties to advise clients of climate-related risks, and also some further recognition of equally important risks from biodiversity and nature loss.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll