header-logo header-logo

09 September 2010
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Client funding alternatives

Third party funding on the rise among top 200 firms

Litigation funders have been used by half of the top 200 law firms, according to new research.

In the first of an annual litigation survey by Harbour Litigation Funding Ltd, 90% of firms said they “always” or “sometimes” discuss litigation funding options with their clients.

Harbour’s head of litigation funding, Susan Dunn, says: “We are increasingly seeing interest from claimants who can well afford the costs of litigation but want to share that risk and appreciate having us alongside them through the litigation.”

The survey, conducted over the summer, found three-quarters of claims are for £3m or less, while eight per cent have a value of more than £10m.
One in 10 cases incur legal costs in excess of £500,000— including experts’ fees, counsel and adverse costs, while 72% incur costs lower than £250,000.

Some firms reported that litigation time periods have increased over the last year. A third of firms said it now takes longer for High Court matters, and nearly 90% said the same for arbitrations and three-quarters said the same for tribunal cases.

However, 70% of matters relate to disputes that are less than two years old, and firms say they expect more than 80% of claims to get to trial in the High Court within two years of commencement. More than a quarter of claims are expected to reach trial within one year of commencement.

An arbitration hearing is held within two years in 90% of cases, and before the year is out in 44% of cases. Tribunal hearings are held within two years in 92% of cases, and within one year in 69% of cases.

Commercial contract disputes form the bulk of the litigation workload for the firms (44%) while professional negligence claims account for 12% and insolvency related claims make up nine per cent of litigation work. Fraud claims account for seven per cent, IP claims make up six per cent and breach of trust accounts for four per cent of litigation.

Issue: 7432 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll