header-logo header-logo

Clarifying ‘cladding’

24 October 2025 / Bhavini Patel
Issue: 8136 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant , Leasehold , Health & safety , Construction
printer mail-detail
233321
A landmark decision of the Upper Tribunal has widened the scope of cladding remediation: Bhavini Patel reports
  • The Upper Tribunal has given the widest interpretation to the meaning of ‘cladding’ and ‘cladding remediation’, and provided guidance on what is meant by an unsafe cladding system under the Building Safety Act 2022.
  • This provides much-needed guidance on how the leaseholder protections operate when a building has an unsafe cladding system which requires remediation.

In Almacantar Centre Point Nominee No1 Ltd and another company v De Valk and others [2025] UKUT 298 (LC), the Upper Tribunal (UT) has dismissed an appeal bought by the landlord applicant, Almacantar, ruling in favour of the leaseholders. It has given the widest interpretation to the meaning of ‘cladding’ and ‘cladding remediation’, and provided guidance on what is meant by an unsafe cladding system under the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA 2022). This decision involves the iconic Centre Point House in Tottenham Court Road. The judgment cements the UT’s desire to uphold Michael Gove’s pledge

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll