header-logo header-logo

15 February 2017
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Claire Shaw—Keystone Law

claire_shaw

Firm recruits white collar crime expert

Keystone Law has appointed ex-senior prosecutor for the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) Claire Shaw. Claire, who arrives from a specialist in-house role at GE Global Investigations and also headed up Pinsent Mason’s anti-bribery and corruption team, will work across corporate, fraud and financial crime and litigation.

Claire has almost three decades’ experience in advising on all aspects of white collar crime. This includes responding to and defending SFO cases and other government and regulatory investigations, the review of and/or implementation of anti-bribery policies and practice, corporate internal fraud and corruption investigations, and providing advice on directors’ liability under the criminal law. She has an in-depth knowledge of complex international cases, instigated against corporates and individuals by the SFO and other UK and European government agencies, as well as the US Department of Justice. She has advised both corporate and individual clients extensively, from dawn raids and police station attendance, through to negotiated settlement or trial and appeal.

Keystone’s managing director and founder, James Knight, commented: “Claire’s experience with the SFO, as well as her experience of working in-house makes her an excellent fit for Keystone Law. The UK jurisdiction is becoming increasingly pivotal to multi-jurisdictional bribery and corruption investigations and Claire’s unique combination of expertise means that she is able to approach such work from every possible angle. We look forward to working with her.”

Claire added: "I'm beyond delighted to be working at such a collegiate and dynamic firm as Keystone. It seems I have found the perfect fit, at a firm which enables me to leverage my experience and expertise and provides clients with advice from experienced specialist lawyers at excellent value for money rates. It's a win-win!"

Issue: 7735 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll