header-logo header-logo

Claims controversy continues

08 September 2011
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers hit back at ABI accusations of excessive fees & manipulation

Claimant lawyers’ groups have hit back at insurers’ claims that they “manipulate” the system, charge “excessive” fees, and leave consumers worse off.

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) made the accusations in a report published this week, which was backed by business groups and retailers including Lloyd’s and Argos.

The report, Tackling the Compensation Culture, said the number of personal injury claims received by insurers rose 72% between 2002 and 2010, and that people got more compensation, typically an extra £289, quicker if they dealt with an insurer rather than a lawyer.

It blamed the “have a go compensation culture” for rising motor insurance premiums and said the NHS paid out more than £257m in lawyers’ fees as a result of claims in 2010/2011. Fraudulent and exaggerated whiplash claims can easily be made, it said, while excessive legal costs sometimes exceed the level of damages. It adds that there is no financial incentive for claimants to ensure costs are reasonable, and referral fees increase costs without adding value.

In response Andrew Dismore, co-ordinator of the Access to Justice Action Group (AJAG) said: “Cases only go to court when the insurers deny liability or refuse to pay adequate compensation. The insurers have only themselves to blame for legal costs: if they accept liability and make early reasonable offers, then the costs are contained. The ABI is in overdrive in its well financed campaign to blame the public, lawyers, and the government for rises in insurance premiums: everyone but themselves. While the ABI routinely alleges fraud, the proven number of cases is comparatively small...and there is the other side of the coin, when insurers allege spurious or fraudulent defences to deny claimants rightful compensation. Although they complain about the impact of claims, the liability insurers have not indicated by how much they would reduce premiums, or even that premiums would be reduced at all, if the changes they demand are implemented. Indeed, there is evidence that premiums may actually increase.”

Des Hudson, the Law Society’s chief executive, said the ABI report was self-serving to the insurance industry. “Lawyers exist to ensure that people get their just compensation and are not manipulated by the insurance industry. Does anyone seriously believe that insurers would pay out claims unnecessarily?”

Issue: 7480 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll