Claimants & QOCS: caught in a trap?

21 April 2023 / Samuel Hayman , Tom Jenkinson

Issue: 8021 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Costs , Procedure & practice , Damages

Have the changes to the qualified one-way costs shifting regime tipped the scales too far in favour of defendants? Samuel Hayman & Tom Jenkinson examine the perilous new situation for claimants

Changes to QOCS rules from 6 April 2023 mean there will be an increased risk of adverse costs for claimants in personal injury litigation.
The rules won’t be enforceable for cases initiated prior to 6 April 2023.
It seems the new rules only benefit claimants where the claim is discontinued and there are no damages or costs at all.

The qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) regime for cases issued prior to 6 April 2023 was clarified in two key cases: Cartwright v Venduct Engineering Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1654, [2018] All ER (D) 99 (Jul) and Ho v Adelekun [2021] UKSC 43, [2021] All ER (D) 17 (Oct).

These cases meant that costs orders in a defendant’s favour are unenforceable, unless there are ‘damages ordered’ in the context of CPR 44.14—essentially

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Claimants & QOCS: caught in a trap?

Have the changes to the qualified one-way costs shifting regime tipped the scales too far in favour of defendants? Samuel Hayman & Tom Jenkinson examine the perilous new situation for claimants

Changes to QOCS rules from 6 April 2023 mean there will be an increased risk of adverse costs for claimants in personal injury litigation.
The rules won’t be enforceable for cases initiated prior to 6 April 2023.
It seems the new rules only benefit claimants where the claim is discontinued and there are no damages or costs at all.

These cases meant that costs orders in a defendant’s favour are unenforceable, unless there are ‘damages ordered’ in the context of CPR 44.14—essentially

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties

The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings

NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices

Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur

Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?

Philip Sales is selected as next Deputy President

Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year

Tax shock ahead for partners?

Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget

Error message

Claimants & QOCS: caught in a trap?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington