header-logo header-logo

05 September 2015
Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-detail

Claim against Visa continues

An appeal by Asda, Debenhams and other high street retailers to uphold an extended limitation period on their claim against Visa Europe and Visa Inc for breach of EU, UK and Irish competition law, has been declined by the Court of Appeal, in Arcadia Group Brands and others v Visa Inc and others [2015] EWCA Civ 883. However, the claim, worth an estimated £570m, now continues in the High Court.

The retailers claim Visa inflated the price they paid for accepting credit and debit cards since 1977 by charging a multilateral interchange fee (MIF), and unlawfully restricting competition.The MIF sets a minimum price that is paid by the retailer’s bank to the customer’s bank whenever a customer uses Visa.

The Court of Appeal held that all claims dating between 1977 and 2007 are time-barred under the Limitation Act 1980, s 32(1)(b). As to whether an extension was justified on the basis Visa concealed facts, the Court held only those facts sufficient to plead a prima facie claim were relevant to S 32(1)(b).

Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll