header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 3 June 2011

02 June 2011 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Super bolts, super supper, super speculation & super duper deposit win

Bolt upright, please

The Family Advocacy Scheme was cursed into force on 9 May 2011, applying to cases in which the funding application was made on or after that date. Advocates will need to know their bolt-on entitlements better than their Red Book if frayed shirt collars are to be avoided.

There’s a 25% bolt-on to the hearing fee where the client (not another party) is facing allegations of significant harm to a child. In public law, the allegations must have been made by the local authority and in both public and private law, still be live. Significant harm is defined. Death is generously included as are burns and scalds and fabricated illness. Representation of a person who has difficulty giving instructions or understanding advice will also rank for a 25% bolt-on in public law children cases but only if (inter alia) verified by a report from a psychologist or psychiatrist (and not based simply on a punch-up with counsel

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll