header-logo header-logo

14 March 2025 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8108 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way , CPR , Fees
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 14 March 2025

Sue soon; CFO not so special; party wars at the TCC; latest CPR PD update; neighbourly land grabs

BEAT THE HIKE

Subject to the small irritant of parliamentary approval, some 171 civil, family and tribunal etc fees will be increased for issue on or after 1 April 2025. Issue before then and clients will be much impressed. The majority of fees will be up by an inflationary 3.2%. In the civil world, they include possessions and enforcements; the beloved N244 general application on notice which will cost £313 a throw; and the trial fee (note to HMCTS: it is no longer called a hearing fee) which will cost an extra £159 on the multi-track (and presumably intermediate track as well, although HMCTS does not expressly say so) and £74 on the fast track. No change for small claims. They have sneaked in a £4 rise to £19 for the issue of a certificate of satisfaction, which my calculator tells me is an increase of 26.66%. Perhaps an April Fooling?

Over

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll