header-logo header-logo

23 January 2015
Issue: 7637 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 23 January 2015

Regulated unregulated credit, cross-border harassment & CPR latest

NOT AS IT SEEMS

Prior to 6 April 2008 consumer credit agreements for more than £25,000 were not regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974). For nine years before then, Northern Rock had a product which allowed borrowers to take out an unsecured loan as an adjunct to their mortgage under which interest was charged at the mortgage rate. However, Northern Rock used the same paperwork for these over £25,000 loans as they did for the £25,000 and under loans (as did certain other lenders). Not only the loan agreement itself but the pre-contractual and other contractual documentation repeatedly informed borrowers that the loan was regulated and that they would benefit from the rights available under CCA 1974.

The failure to distinguish between what was regulated and what was intended by the Northern Rock to be unregulated has presented headaches which a bucketful of aspirin would fail to mitigate for the state-owned Northern Rock successor company. They arise because it was discovered that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll