header-logo header-logo

Civil Procedure (Amendment No 4) Rules 2011 SI 2011/3103

10 January 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Amendments are made to allow for the centralisation of the issue of money claims and further administrative functions up to, but not including, the hearing stage...

Commencement date
19 March 2012

Legislation Affected

SI 1998/3132 amended


Summary

Amends the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 as follows:

(a) Amendments are made to allow for the centralisation of the issue of money claims and further administrative functions up to, but not including, the hearing stage. Money claims will be processed at the County Court Money Claim Centre in Salford and issued in the name of Northampton County Court. The Centre will also handle requests for judgment, defences and allocation questionnaires. Cases will be transferred out to the appropriate county court if judicial intervention is required and, if and when a hearing is required. Centralisation of these administrative functions will give effect to the Government’s commitment to provide an efficient and effective justice system, whilst reducing delays in the hearing and determination of cases; eliminating

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll