header-logo header-logo

Civil legal aid: follow the money

02 June 2023 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
124248
Roger Smith sets out a vision for a national legal aid service—& how we might go about funding it

The Ministry of Justice fared ill under the Osborne-Cameron austerity cuts. As we now enter a new political age—whatever the result of the general election next year—we have to work out a sensible way of going forward from what, frankly, is a mess. This is amply exemplified by the state of civil legal aid.

The cuts’ initial impact, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies, would have reduced departmental spending by 40%. In the event, this proved too much even for the most gung ho of treasury ministers. The cuts finally plateaued at around 25%—though not before we got the (now revoked) privatisation of the Probation Service and a chaotic court modernisation programme. We also got the evisceration of civil legal aid through the ill-famed Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012.

Civil legal aid contributed a pretty exact share to the departmental cuts. Its spending declined from £1.3bn

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll