header-logo header-logo

11 January 2021
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil Justice Council shares recommendations for guideline hourly rates

35134
The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has published its recommended guideline hourly rates for solicitors, along with points for consultation
The recommendations were produced by a working group led by Mr Justice Stewart, which began seeking evidence in August 2020 (check). The rates are a guideline figure for a reasonable charge per hour for work on a case, and provide a starting point for judges when considering costs. They are banded according to geographical location (London 1,2,3 and National 1,2) and experience of practitioner (Grade A-D).

Recommended increases vary from (London 1) £512 (25.2%) for Grade A to £186 (34.8%) for Grade D to (National 2) £255 (26.78%) for Grade A to £126 (13.5%) for Grade D.

Stewart J’s report notes that future reviews should take into account ‘changes in working practice brought about by new technology, the sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic and the HMCTS reform programme’.

The guideline hourly rates have not changed since 2010―previous recommendations made by a costs committee chaired by Mr Justice Foskett were not taken up by the Master of the Rolls in 2015 due to a lack of responses from law firms.

Richard Miller, head of justice at the Law Society, said: ‘Guideline hourly rates for solicitors have not been changed in over ten years and were long overdue a review.

‘Revised rates would give both solicitors and their clients greater clarity about costs and we look forward to responding to the consultation points raised in the report. Although this report has been carried out as a standalone piece of work, it will be important to consider these changes in the context of other civil justice reforms including the Ministry of Justice’s work on fixed recoverable costs and the wider HMCTS reform programme.’

Association of Costs Lawyers chair Claire Green said: ‘It is unarguable that the GHRs need to be increased after a decade-long freeze.

‘Deciding on new rates is no easy task. The working group describes its proposed increases as ‘modest’ and if nothing else that will hopefully aid their approval should they be the final figures recommended to the Master of the Rolls.

‘The report also makes some welcome tweaks to the regime, most notably by re-categorising London 1 and London 2 bands to reflect the type of work done rather than a firm’s postcode, and ensuring that every part of the country outside the capital is specifically allocated to a band.

‘The working group notes that, back in 2015, the then Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, accepted the recommendation that suitably qualified costs lawyers should be eligible for grades B and C. Implementation of this, and recognition of the value of our work, is now long overdue.’

The consultation on the recommendations is open until 31 March 2021. See: bit.ly/3sgwFUv.

 

Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll