header-logo header-logo

Civil judicial co-operation post Brexit

01 September 2017
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Family and civil lawyers have welcomed government calls for a cross-border civil judicial co-operation framework post Brexit

Under current reciprocal arrangements, a decision made by a court in the UK can be enforced in other EU Member States, enabling citizens to enforce orders made by the civil and family courts on commerce, trade and family matters such as child custody and maintenance.

After Brexit, the UK will no longer be part of this arrangement with EU Member States. Lawyers had warned of the uncertainties that families and businesses with international links might face.

However, the government said last week that it will ‘seek to agree new close and comprehensive arrangements for civil judicial cooperation with the EU,’ in its position paper, Providing a cross-border civil judicial cooperation framework.

Andrew Langdon QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said the position paper ‘shows that the government has been in listening mode when talking to the Bar Council and others on this crucial topic... However, the devil will be in the detail’.

Daniel Eames, chair of family lawyers group Resolution’s International Committee, said: ‘Cross border family law for intra EU-UK cases—whether divorce, children or financial—requires reciprocity.

‘Without reciprocal rules, there can be no legal certainty in treatment with all the ensuing complications, delays and potential costs for families and children or local authorities undertaking their child protection function.’

Ed Crosse, partner, Simmons & Simmons, said the paper confirms the UK government’s commitment to re-sign the 2005 Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. ‘As so many commercial agreements contain exclusive jurisdiction clauses, this is an important statement from the UK government, which should provide comfort to commercial parties,’ he said.

Issue: 7759 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll