header-logo header-logo

06 October 2020
Issue: 7905 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Church failed children on abuse

Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse puts Anglican Church under the spotlight

The Anglican Church failed to protect children from predators within its ranks, and supported abusers rather than victims, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse (IICSA) has concluded.

Since the 1940s, at least 390 clergy or persons in positions of trust have been convicted of sexual offences against children. Many more victims have come forward with allegations against priests, vicars and youth leaders. In its report on abuse in the Anglican Church, published this week, the IICSA made eight recommendations, including creating a mandatory code of practice for clergy on safeguarding, the appointment of a diocesan safeguarding officer and implementing a formal information-sharing protocol between churches.

However, the ICCSA stopped short of recommending mandatory reporting, although it expects to address this issue in its final report. It heard widespread support, particularly among victims and survivors, for making failure to report child sexual abuse a crime. However, there were conflicting views on what should be reported, when and to whom. The Charity Commission also expressed concerns that an increase in referrals might divert attention from the most serious cases―instead, it supported a criminal offence of deliberately concealing child sexual abuse.

The government consulted on mandatory reporting in 2016 but only 12% of respondents were in favour of a change in the law.

Alan Collins, partner at Hugh James and specialist child abuse lawyer, said: ‘The evidence presented to IICSA makes it abundantly clear that it should be mandatory for any person in a position of trust to report an allegation, or suspicion, of child sexual abuse to the police.

‘To be effective, any failure to do so should be an offence for both the individual and the body that they belong to or represent. Without this, children remain in grave danger of being failed, not only by the perpetrator, but by the system that should be there to protect and serve. This would be a serious missed opportunity.’

Issue: 7905 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll