header-logo header-logo

Children at risk of deprivation of liberty

02 April 2025
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Local authority , Community care , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
Local authorities are increasingly using ‘deprivation of liberty’ orders to house troubled children in unregistered accommodation often many miles from home, the Law Society has warned.

Ministry of Justice figures published last week show 1,280 High Court ‘deprivation of liberty’ applications were made for children in 2024. 132 were for children aged 12 years and under, 734 were for children aged 13-15, and 414 were aged 16-18 years.

The Law Society highlighted that a lack of secure children’s home places meant unregistered accommodation was often used for children, and that families are not automatically eligible for legal aid.

Urging the government to make legal aid available, Richard Atkinson, president of the Law Society, said: ‘These are distressing cases with children who may have faced trauma and/or have physical and mental disabilities.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll