header-logo header-logo

Child victims could be named

09 April 2014
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Charity condemns Lord Justice Leveson's ruling

Just for Kids Law has condemned a decision this week by Lord Justice Leveson to limit anonymity protections for children in court. 

The charity says it could deter child victims and witnesses, and impede rehabilitation for young offenders. 

Leveson LJ held, in JC, RT v CPS and BBC [2014] EWHC 1041 (QB) that children previously involved in court proceedings can be named in the media after they turn 18. He called on Parliament to “fashion a solution…as a matter of real urgency”. 

He said: “It is truly remarkable that Parliament was prepared to make provision for lifetime protection available to adult witnesses...but not to extend that protection to those under 18 once they had reached the age of majority, even if the same qualifying conditions were satisfied.”

The charity’s director, Shauneen Lambe, described the decision as “damaging and concerning”.

Following the ruling, children will have less protection than vulnerable adults, who are given anonymity for life under the Youth Justice & Criminal Evidence Act 1999, she said.

“The difficulties of encouraging child victims and witnesses to come forward are well recognised, as has been reported by the NSPCC report into the Jimmy Saville scandal. 

“The BBC’s own Child Protection Policy says that children’s best interests are at the heart of everything that they do, but I am not sure children would agree. For a child, knowing that they could be named in the world’s press once they turn 18 could be a real deterrent to their coming forward.” 

 

Issue: 7602 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Ceri Morgan analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Johnson v FirstRand Bank
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
In this month's update, employment guru Ian Smith reveals the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s pivotal role in the ongoing supermarket equal pay litigation, upholding most findings and confirming that detailed training materials are valid evidence of actual work
County court cases are speeding up, with the median time from claim to hearing 62 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims—5.4 weeks faster than last year
back-to-top-scroll