header-logo header-logo

09 April 2014
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Child victims could be named

Charity condemns Lord Justice Leveson's ruling

Just for Kids Law has condemned a decision this week by Lord Justice Leveson to limit anonymity protections for children in court. 

The charity says it could deter child victims and witnesses, and impede rehabilitation for young offenders. 

Leveson LJ held, in JC, RT v CPS and BBC [2014] EWHC 1041 (QB) that children previously involved in court proceedings can be named in the media after they turn 18. He called on Parliament to “fashion a solution…as a matter of real urgency”. 

He said: “It is truly remarkable that Parliament was prepared to make provision for lifetime protection available to adult witnesses...but not to extend that protection to those under 18 once they had reached the age of majority, even if the same qualifying conditions were satisfied.”

The charity’s director, Shauneen Lambe, described the decision as “damaging and concerning”.

Following the ruling, children will have less protection than vulnerable adults, who are given anonymity for life under the Youth Justice & Criminal Evidence Act 1999, she said.

“The difficulties of encouraging child victims and witnesses to come forward are well recognised, as has been reported by the NSPCC report into the Jimmy Saville scandal. 

“The BBC’s own Child Protection Policy says that children’s best interests are at the heart of everything that they do, but I am not sure children would agree. For a child, knowing that they could be named in the world’s press once they turn 18 could be a real deterrent to their coming forward.” 

 

Issue: 7602 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll