header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Child care court fee could go

Report’s findings could trigger an end to the controversial fees

A £4,000 court fee for child care proceedings could be scrapped following a report into the tragic case of Baby P.

Lord Laming’s report, published on 12 March, looks at whether the reforms he proposed after the death of Victoria Climbié in 2000 have been implemented. It makes 58 recommendations, including the appointment of an independent person to undertake a review of the impact of court fees, with a view to abolishing them from 2010–11 onwards.

Court fees for care proceedings were controversially raised from about £150 to about £4,000 in May 2008.

Lord Laming says, in his report: “It is of concern that the need to pay a fee might sometimes present a barrier that could influence a local authority’s decision as to whether or not to commence care proceedings... If even in one case a local authority is deterred in taking action, that is one case too many.”

Children’s Secretary Ed Balls MP has said there will be a review of court fees and that if there is evidence the fees are a barrier for local authorities when deciding whether to proceed, the government will abolish them. He has accepted all of Lord Laming’s recommendations.

Commenting on Mr Balls’s statement, Lucy Theis QC, chairman of the Family Law Bar Association, says: “The minister’s response, set out very clearly the huge challenge faced by those dealing with vulnerable families on a daily basis.

“The support and expertise of the Family Bar, which provides specialist representation by dedicated practitioners who often have to deal with incredibly difficult situations involving child protection, is vital if we are to give the public the service they deserve.”

Desmond Browne QC, chairman of the Bar, says: “It was inevitable that an increase from £150 to £4,825 for a fully contested matter would deter some authorities from acting.”

Lord Laming’s report, The Protection of Children in England: A Progress Report, warns there has been an “over-emphasis on process and targets” within social work departments, which has caused already overstretched social workers to lose confidence. It calls for better communication between agencies, on-thejob training for social work students, and for directors with no child protection experience to appoint an experienced social work manager to support them.

Lord Laming adds: “Rather than feeling valued for their commitment and expertise, professionals across these services often feel undervalued, unsupported and at risk.”

Issue: 7361 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll