Child benefit

17 June 2016 / David Burrows

Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family

When does the common law listen to the child, asks David Burrows

Can children’s evidence in family proceedings be dealt with in a way analogous with such evidence in criminal proceedings?
Are special measures for child evidence available in children proceedings?
How does the law balance fairness to alleged abusers with the welfare of child witnesses?

In Richardson v Richardson [2011] EWCA Civ 79, [2011] All ER (D) 86 (Feb) Lord Justice Munby (now Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division) reminded everyone (at para [53]) that “the Family Division is part of the High Court. It is not some legal Alsatia where the common law and equity do not apply. The rules of agency [in that particular case] apply there as much as elsewhere….” And so it is, surely, with the application of rules about children’s evidence?

This article asks: do common law rules apply in family proceedings in the same way as they do, for example, for children’s evidence in criminal proceedings? And, if so, does a family

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Child benefit

When does the common law listen to the child, asks David Burrows

Can children’s evidence in family proceedings be dealt with in a way analogous with such evidence in criminal proceedings?
Are special measures for child evidence available in children proceedings?
How does the law balance fairness to alleged abusers with the welfare of child witnesses?

This article asks: do common law rules apply in family proceedings in the same way as they do, for example, for children’s evidence in criminal proceedings? And, if so, does a family

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties

The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings

NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices

Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur

Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?

Philip Sales is selected as next Deputy President

Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year

Tax shock ahead for partners?

Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget

Error message

Child benefit

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington