header-logo header-logo

Separated families, child arrangements & coronavirus

20 April 2020 / Alexandra Baggallay
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Family
printer mail-detail
Alexandra Baggallay considers the law & options available for separated parents during COVID-19
  • Explains the law relating to Child Arrangement Orders during the pandemic.
  • Considers the law where parents agree on contact, and where they don’t.
  • Makes practical suggestions for separated parents during the outbreak.

COVID-19 poses huge challenges to all families, but particularly for separated parents working out how best to co-parent during a pandemic.

Many children whose parents are separated spend time with each parent, whether that is a few hours on weekends, or by dividing their time equally across two households. The old terms ‘contact’ and ‘residence’ have been replaced with ‘child arrangements’, and an order setting out which time the child is to spend with each parent is a ‘Child Arrangements Order’ (CAO). Many separated parents do not have a court order setting out the arrangements for their children, where they have been able to reach agreement on the arrangements without court assistance.

Can existing arrangements continue?

The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll