header-logo header-logo

Litigation funding agreements: chasing waterfalls?

01 September 2023 / Oliver Way
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Features , Profession , Litigation funding , Costs
printer mail-detail
135192
What can you expect from a litigation funding agreement? Oliver Way sets out budget considerations, waterfall details & other key points you may encounter
  • A relationship between a litigation funder and a funded party is governed by a contract known as a litigation funding agreement (LFA).
  • Key elements of a LFA include a detailed budget for the case, the waterfall of payments, what happens if any dispute arises, and confirmation that the funded party remains in control of the litigation.

Once a litigation funder has agreed to finance a claim, the next step is to draft a litigation funding agreement (LFA). Knowing about the clauses which are important to a funder allows you to give early advice to your client on what to expect.

At its core, a LFA sets out basic principles: the promises a funder makes to meet all the fees and disbursements involved in bringing the claim, and providing an indemnity for any adverse costs which might arise, in exchange for the return of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll