header-logo header-logo

Litigation funding agreements: chasing waterfalls?

01 September 2023 / Oliver Way
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Features , Profession , Litigation funding , Costs
printer mail-detail
135192
What can you expect from a litigation funding agreement? Oliver Way sets out budget considerations, waterfall details & other key points you may encounter
  • A relationship between a litigation funder and a funded party is governed by a contract known as a litigation funding agreement (LFA).
  • Key elements of a LFA include a detailed budget for the case, the waterfall of payments, what happens if any dispute arises, and confirmation that the funded party remains in control of the litigation.

Once a litigation funder has agreed to finance a claim, the next step is to draft a litigation funding agreement (LFA). Knowing about the clauses which are important to a funder allows you to give early advice to your client on what to expect.

At its core, a LFA sets out basic principles: the promises a funder makes to meet all the fees and disbursements involved in bringing the claim, and providing an indemnity for any adverse costs which might arise, in exchange for the return of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll