header-logo header-logo

27 June 2019 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

Charity partnerships: birds of a feather

Charities should be aware of the risks as well as the benefits when partnering with non-charities, says Bethan Walsh

  • Charities working with non-charities: the Charity Commission’s new guidance.

Working with non-charitable organisations or ‘non-charities’ can offer charities great benefits—for example, fundraising and profile-raising, to name just a couple of the more obvious benefits. But charities have to deal with the fact that this strategy also carries a number of risks, including reputation and loss of income. For example, if the non-charity is reflected poorly in the media for whatever reason, that could result in reputational issues for the charity.

Following last year’s consultation on the draft guidance, the Charity Commission has published its long-anticipated new guidance on ‘Charities with a connection to a non-charity’. The guidance sets out the Commission’s expectations for managing relationships where charities are connected to non-charities. A key motive behind the guidance is to address concerns that some links between charities and non-charities have damaged public trust and confidence in charity generally.

While the focus

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll