header-logo header-logo

24 January 2008
Issue: 7305 / Categories: Legal News , Practice areas
printer mail-detail

Charities given public benefit guidance

Charities

General guidance for charities on public benefit has been published by the Charity Commission.

The Charities Act 2006 requires charities from 31 March 2009 to show they are established for public benefit and gives the commission responsibility for issuing guidance and judging whether a charity complies.
The new guidance—Charities and Public Benefit: the Charity Commission’s General Guidance on Public Benefit—identifies two key principles of public benefit: there must be an identifiable benefit/s; and the benefit/s must be to the public, or a section of the public.

Forsters solicitor Andrew Penny says under the guidance, actions, not words matter.
He says: “Some charities will need to review and change their objectives. For most it will be a question of reviewing their activities. Trustees will be expected to take the initiative and be imaginative and inventive in finding ways to benefit the public.”

He adds that the commission takes its policing role seriously, but does not expect change overnight and will assist charities to make the changes needed.
“Where a charity’s objects are incompatible with the public benefit requirement it will facilitate a transfer to a body as close as possible which can fulfil it,” he adds. (See this issue, p 113.)
 

Issue: 7305 / Categories: Legal News , Practice areas
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll