header-logo header-logo

Charities & business rates: at cross purposes?

28 July 2023 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Features , Public , Charities , Local government
printer mail-detail
132290
Should a charity’s entire premises attract business rate relief, or just those that benefit the public directly? Nicholas Dobson examines a recent case
  • Charity law assesses whether a body’s purposes are charitable by looking at its purposes and activities overall, not on a site-by-site basis.
  • Consequently, even if one site of a charity with multiple sites across the UK did not benefit the poor but, in the round, the charity did, the site in question was still eligible for mandatory business rate relief.

Charity may, as the Bible tells us, ‘cover the multitude of sins’ but can it provide any relief against tax liability? That was a question before the Supreme Court in March 2023 when the court had to consider ‘the intersection between two venerable bodies of English law, namely charities and rating’. The issue was whether a registered charity (whose purposes are ‘to advance, promote and maintain health and healthcare of all descriptions and to prevent, relieve and cure sickness and ill health

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll