header-logo header-logo

A change of heart

15 January 2016 / Bianca Venkata
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
nlj_7682_venkata

Bianca Venkata heralds the coming into force of the new senior management regime

On 7 March 2016 the new senior management regime (the regime) will come into force. The regime introduces three key requirements which aim to hold senior managers to account. On 15 October 2015 HM Treasury announced that it was removing the controversial “reverse burden of proof” from the regime. This is despite the fact that the reverse burden of proof was strongly recommended by the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards (PCBS) and supported by the government, Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

This article considers three key requirements of the regime and the impact of the removal of the reverse burden of proof.

Background

The financial crisis in 2008 fundamentally changed the perception of the financial sector. The global credit crunch resulted in the near collapse of the banking system. The government invested £37bn to bail out Royal Bank of Scotland, Lloyds TSB, and HBOS. In December 2008, the FTSE 100 closed down by 31.3%, the biggest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll