header-logo header-logo

Change of approach for computer program patents

21 February 2008
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection , Other practice areas , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Patents

Some computer programs can be patented, the High Court has ruled. The decision in Astron Clinica Ltd and others v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks has prompted the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK-IPO) to change its approach to patents for computer programs.

I t says it will not appeal against Mr Justice Kitchin’s ruling that patents should be allowed to protect a computer program if the program implements a patentable invention.

The law on patentable subject matter in the field of computer-implemented inventions was substantially reinterpreted by the Court of Appeal in 2006, in Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd and others; Re Macrossan’s Application. Followingthat judgment, UK-IPO concluded that claims to computer programs or to programs on a carrier were not allowable.

However, in Astron, a group of patent applicants successfully argued that if their computer-implemented methods and apparatus were patentable, they should also be able to protect the underlying computer programs themselves. Kitchin J said: “I do not detect anything in the reasoning of the Court of Appeal which suggests that all computer programs are necessarily excluded.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll