header-logo header-logo

Change of approach for computer program patents

21 February 2008
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection , Other practice areas , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Patents

Some computer programs can be patented, the High Court has ruled. The decision in Astron Clinica Ltd and others v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks has prompted the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK-IPO) to change its approach to patents for computer programs.

I t says it will not appeal against Mr Justice Kitchin’s ruling that patents should be allowed to protect a computer program if the program implements a patentable invention.

The law on patentable subject matter in the field of computer-implemented inventions was substantially reinterpreted by the Court of Appeal in 2006, in Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd and others; Re Macrossan’s Application. Followingthat judgment, UK-IPO concluded that claims to computer programs or to programs on a carrier were not allowable.

However, in Astron, a group of patent applicants successfully argued that if their computer-implemented methods and apparatus were patentable, they should also be able to protect the underlying computer programs themselves. Kitchin J said: “I do not detect anything in the reasoning of the Court of Appeal which suggests that all computer programs are necessarily excluded.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll