header-logo header-logo

Chain reaction

29 September 2011 / Brent Mcdonald
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Brent McDonald investigates a defendant’s liability for injuries sustained by a claimant in a subsequent incident

In Dalling v RJ Heale & Co [2011] EWCA Civ 365, [2011] All ER (D) 54 (Apr) the Court of Appeal was asked to determine whether the defendant was liable for injuries suffered in accidents that occurred three years apart.

Following on from Corr v IBC Vehicles [2008] 1 AC 884, [2008] 2 All ER 943, Dalling is a further appellate case dealing with the difficult question of the point at which a claimant can no longer recover for the ongoing consequences of a defendant’s tort.

Facts of Dalling

On 4 March 2005, the claimant suffered a severe head injury while working for the defendant. The head injury included an extensive right petrous bone fracture and extensive frontal contusions leading to brain swelling.

Surprisingly the claimant suffered no significant cognitive or intellectual deficit, but was left with executive dysfunction. This led to poor concentration, short attention span, impaired memory, some loss of emotional control, variation of mood, fatigue,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll