header-logo header-logo

11 October 2022
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

CBA strike suspended… for now

Criminal law barristers have voted to suspend their strike action, following a revised offer from the justice secretary, but warned the dispute would not be resolved until the offer was implemented.

The ballot result was 57% in favour of suspension against almost 43% for continuing the strike (1,488 voted yes to suspending the action while 1,117 voted no, out of 2,605 votes cast).

Justice secretary Brandon Lewis offered an extra £54m, raising fees by 15% for the ‘vast majority’ of cases currently before or due to come before the Crown Court. Under the previous offer, the 15% rise would only apply to cases starting on or after 1 October.

Announcing the ballot results, Criminal Bar Association (CBA) chair Kirsty Brimelow KC (pictured) and CBA executive members said: ‘Barristers should not have to fight so hard again to bring this responsibility back home to government.

‘The offer from the government is an overdue start. Its acceptance by barristers is on the basis that it is implemented.

‘Otherwise, the CBA will ballot again to lift the suspension of action… our members remain ready to act again.’

The CBA said it would now focus on setting up the criminal legal aid advisory board.

Mark Fenhalls KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The offer was the culmination of many months of work and pressure, and unprecedented personal sacrifice by barristers.’

However, Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘The justice minister may think he has got one problem off his table but there are bigger problems coming his way as this dispute continues.

‘This is another example of a government U-turn making a bad situation worse’. She warned solicitors would see the government had found ‘a magic money tree to stop the disruptive action of barristers—money that was not available to pay solicitors fairly.’

Boyce called for parity on the 15% fee increase—solicitors’ fees are increasing by just 9%.

Boyce said: ‘If the gap isn’t bridged by the time the government publishes their full response to the independent review in November, we have made it clear we will advise our members that there is no viable future in criminal legal aid work.’

Issue: 7998 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll