header-logo header-logo

A cautionary tale

04 September 2009 / Mark Sefton , Oliver Radley-Gardner
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Clark v Lucas Solicitors serves as a timely warning for conveyancing solicitors say Mark Sefton & Oliver Radley-Gardner

Conveyancing solicitors acting for residential developers should be aware of the cautionary tale told by Clark v Lucas Solicitors LLP [2009] EWHC 1952 (Ch). Adrian and Heather Clark were the purchasers of a house on a new residential development in Monmouthshire. The purchase price was £560,000. The seller was the developer, a company called Gainsborough Homes Ltd.

The overall funding for the development had been provided in the main loan facility from Natwest Bank plc, but in part also by some lending from an individual called Michael Kenny. The Natwest Bank naturally had a first charge over the whole of the development site to protect the bulk of the finance, and Mr Kenny had a second charge, also over the whole of the site, to protect his own financial input. Both of these were all monies charges, in the sense that they provided the lenders with security for the full amount of whatever might be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll