header-logo header-logo

14 May 2025
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Technology , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Caution is the watchword for small & medium firms, according to latest Bellwether Report

Mergers and acquisitions are out and marginal gains are in, according to the Bellwether Report 2025.

The annual LexisNexis report into the small and mid-sized law firm sector, published this week, found only 5% of firms are considering mergers (down from 10% last year and 13% in 2023), while 72% plan to grow organically (up from 40% in 2023). The main reason for this switch is financial uncertainty (53%) and difficulty finding the right partner.

‘Firms are seeking full control over their operations, signalling a careful rebalancing rather than a race to scale,’ said Tim Rayner, small law market lead at LexisNexis UK.

The firms cited a tough economic climate as the main obstacle to achieving their business goals, followed by time pressures and ‘fear of change’. Despite this, however, 58% of lawyers reported revenue growth (up 10% on last year).

Moreover, the report found firms are ‘ready to spend’. Legal recruitment is on the rise, with 39% of firms planning to hire in the next 12 months. Tech investment remains ‘steady and strategic’, while nearly two out of five lawyers said their firm has been encouraged by the success of artificial intelligence (AI) tools to increase their tech investment.

Clients expect a fast response with information they can easily pass on to their superiors, and clear, upfront pricing. According to the report, ‘accessibility and flexibility are also becoming non-negotiable. A third of firms (33%) said clients now expect more options in how and when they engage’.

Rayner said: ‘This year’s findings show that small firms aren’t standing still. They’re moving forward with purpose. Growth, investment and innovation are happening, not through radical change, but through smart, sustainable decisions that protect profit margins and deepen client relationships.’

View the full report: ‘Marginal gains: the hidden levers of growth’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll