header-logo header-logo

Cause & effect

30 May 2014 / Karen O’Sullivan
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
web_sullivanl

The issues of duty of care & causation have been under consideration again, notes Karen O’Sullivan

The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in an interesting case which re-visited issues of duty of care and causation, called Morcom v Biddick [2014] EWCA Civ 182, [2014] All ER (D) 248 (Feb).

The claimant, a long-time acquaintance of the elderly defendant, agreed to fit insulation to the defendant’s loft hatch. The claimant was a professional handyman who previously worked for the defendant, sometimes paid and sometimes not. The defendant was conscious of the risk of the hatch opening beneath his weight or due to the vibration of his drill. To counteract that, the defendant agreed to ensure that the latch stayed shut by holding it in the locked position using the pole used to lock and unlock the hatch. After some minutes, the telephone rang and the defendant left to answer it. During his short conversation, the loft hatch came open and the claimant fell through the hatch, sustaining serious injuries.

The likely cause

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll