header-logo header-logo

Catholic church vicariously liable

18 July 2012
Issue: 7523 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Church legally responsible for child abuse by priests

The Portsmouth Diocese is legally responsible for child abuse committed by one of its priests, the Court of Appeal has held.

In JGE v the Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938, the court held by a 2–1 majority that vicarious liability can arise where a relationship is “akin to employment”.

JGE claimed she was sexually abused by a Catholic priest, Father Baldwin, while she was a young child in a home run by the Diocese.

In November, the High Court held the church was responsible for the misconduct of its clergy. The church appealed on the ground it could not be held liable since there was no formal employment relationship.

Dismissing the appeal, Lord Justice Davis said “the relationship between the bishop and Father Baldwin…was sufficiently akin to that of employment”.

Tracey Emmott, partner at Emmott Snell, who represented JGE, says: “The wider implications of this judgment are significant, such that it is now settled that there no longer has to be a formal employment relationship for legal responsibility to attach to one party for the wrongdoings of another.

“It may be enough if there is a sufficient degree of control by one party over the other, that the wrongdoer was carrying out the purposes or aims of the other, and if it is fair, just and reasonable. All these factors were found to be present in the relationship between a bishop and a priest.”

Issue: 7523 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll