header-logo header-logo

Carry on screening

25 October 2007 / Nicholas Hancox
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Opinion , Local government , Media , Environment
printer mail-detail

The government should have done its homework before bombarding schools with An Inconvenient Truth, says Nicholas Hancox

When the government decided to distribute Al Gore’s partisan film on climate change, An Inconvenient Truth, wholesale and free of charge to every secondary school in England, its civil servant advisers must surely have mentioned their own inconvenient truth; that biased political propaganda is illegal in maintained schools. 

Why would politicians decide to distribute a DVD to thousands of schools, if they did not want to influence the opinions of the pupils who would watch it? Their objective must have been political; they must have wanted the film to change the opinions of the pupils—not about the science of climate change, but about the desired political response to the science of climate change.
Sections 406 and 407 of the Education Act 1996 (EA 1996) were first enacted during Margaret Thatcher’s premiership in 1986. Section 406 bans political indoctrination in maintained schools. Section 407 requires a balanced treatment of all political issues in those same maintained schools.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll