header-logo header-logo

07 June 2007 / Adam Samuel
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Carrots and sticks

Will the new complaint rules make solicitors more accountable? asks Adam Samuel

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and its Solicitors’ Code of Conduct will impose a huge change in the way firms handle complaints after July 2007. The appearance of more detailed rules and guidelines to replace the current loose provisions should benefit those practices that use the opportunity to review their relationships with their clients. For the rest, the new rules could easily become a stick with which the SRA might choose to beat them.

Outgoing rules

Solicitors’ Practice Rule 15 requires a firm to operate a complaints handling procedure in accordance with the Client Care Code. Paragraph 7(b) of that insists that every principal in private practice or recognised body ensures that the practice or body has a complaints procedure, follows it, that clients are told who to contact with concerns about service and that a copy of the procedure is given to them on request. The rules say nothing of the procedure’s required content. This is not a demanding rule.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll