header-logo header-logo

16 April 2025
Issue: 8113 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Sanctions , International
printer mail-detail

Car & school fees switch lands ex-governor of Sevastopol behind bars

Two brothers have been sentenced at Southwark Crown Court in the first-ever UK prosecution of Russian sanction breaches.

Dmitrii Ovsyannikov, 48, the former governor of Sevastopol, which Russia occupied after annexing Crimea, and his brother Alexei Ovsyannikov, 47, were found guilty of eight counts of breaching financial sanctions and two counts of money laundering. Dmitrii, who also served as Russian deputy minister for industry and trade, received 40 months in prison, while Alexei was sentenced to 15 months suspended for 15 months.

Dmitrii has been a designated person in the UK since 2017. After losing his ministerial post, he successfully applied to have his EU sanctions lifted and was issued with a UK passport in January 2023.

In February 2023, he applied for a Halifax bank account, applied to have his UK designated status revoked and attempted to buy a £54,000 Mercedes Benz GLC 300. His wife, Ekaterina, transferred £1,000 and then £75,000 into his bank account. However, his account was frozen once the bank realised he was on the UK sanctions list.

His brother Alexei purchased the car for Dmitrii, left his debit cards for Dmitrii to use in shops in Clapham and Balham while he went on a trip abroad, and, in May 2024, paid school fees for Dmitrii’s children.

These financial transactions were found to contravene the UK sanctions regime.

Julius Capon, unit head prosecutor at the Crown Prosecution Service, said Dmitrii ‘knew he had been on the UK sanctions list since 2017 but chose to ignore this.

‘Another member of his family sought deliberately to breach the sanctions to live their own lavish lifestyle and show complete disregard for the law.’

Graeme Biggar, director general of the National Crime Agency, said: ‘These convictions demonstrate not only that designated individuals are on our radar, but so are those who enable breaches of the regulations.’

Issue: 8113 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Sanctions , International
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll