header-logo header-logo

04 August 2025
Issue: 8128 / Categories: Legal News , Consumer , Financial services litigation , Commercial , Compensation
printer mail-detail

Car dealership ruling not end of road

The Supreme Court’s decision on car dealership commission may have saved the banks but it still leaves the door ‘ajar’ for further claims, lawyers have said

Overturning the Court of Appeal’s decision last week, five justices held car dealers charging commission on loans did not owe fiduciary duties to customers as they were pursuing their ‘own commercial interests, free of any undertaking, express or implied, to act selflessly in the finding and negotiation of a finance package’.

The landmark decision, in Johnson and others v Firstrand Bank and others [2025] UKSC 33, immediately dashed claim managers’ hopes of a £44bn pay-out bonanza from lenders. In one of the three cases only, Johnson, the court ordered the lender to repay the commission with interest on the basis the relationship was unfair.

NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan, of City Law School, said: ‘What struck me was the way in which the court was so keen to support commerce and the right to make a living/ profit.

‘At para [110] the conventional commercial transaction is sensibly upheld. Businesses need to make a profit. There was nothing untoward save in Johnson where there was palpable unfairness.’

According to Browne Jacobson partner Helen Simm, however, ‘the sting could still be in the tail.

‘The court upheld Mr Johnson’s claim under s 140 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA) due to a 55% commission, hidden commercial ties, and misleading paperwork. The clear message is that undisclosed, excessive commissions and deceptive sales tactics may still trigger findings of unfairness under CCA.

‘So while the headline claim has fallen away, the door remains very much ajar and many consumers may yet pursue claims on this narrower, but still potent, basis.’

Jeremy Irving, financial services partner at Browne Jacobson, agreed: ‘The failure to disclose a large commission can still be relevant when assessing the buyer’s or borrower’s rights under the CCA.

‘The court also confirmed that the intermediary’s financial interest, typically a commission, comes from the finance provider, not the buyer. This ruling could have implications for the insurance industry. It raises questions about whether insurance placements are comparable to these “three-cornered” structures, and whether there’s a shared understanding among insurers, policyholders, and the courts about who ultimately bears the cost of intermediary remuneration.

‘The market should also consider the claims ramifications from a potentially large volume of liabilities for car dealers in relation to CCA disputes.’

Guy Wilkes, partner at Mishcon de Reya, said: ‘We haven't seen the end of claims arising out of undisclosed commissions completely.’

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has confirmed it will consult by October on a compensation scheme with pay-outs beginning in 2026, but said most consumers would receive less than £950.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll