header-logo header-logo

Can Donald Trump stand again?

10 November 2023 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8048 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law , International
printer mail-detail
146051
Athelstane Aamodt considers whether the US Constitution can put the brakes on the Trump campaign

Although it remains a deeply impressive and important document, there are some undeniable defects with the Constitution of the United States. One of its most glaring errors is that while it sets out various qualifications to be President (he or she must be 35 years or older, must be born in the US, etc), it does not prevent a person convicted of a felony from being eligible to hold that office. This is a strange omission when one considers that the Constitution even makes it clear that there is no religious test for holding public office in the US (Article VI, Clause 3). Why then did a ‘criminal test’ not enter James Madison’s mind when he was drafting the Constitution between 1787 and 1789?

Trump’s second term?

This omission is now being much-discussed given all of the impending criminal trials that Donald Trump faces. Even if he was convicted and imprisoned, he would, if elected,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll