header-logo header-logo

26 June 2019
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Charities , Community care
printer mail-detail

Calls to repeal pre-Victorian vagrancy laws

A coalition of lawyers, police and homelessness charities has called on the government to scrap the Vagrancy Act 1824, which criminalises rough sleeping and begging.

A report by Crisis, the homelessness charity, published last week, argues that the Act is out of date, inhumane and needlessly pushes vulnerable people further from help. It warns that the Act makes it the responsibility of the police to deal with rough sleeping when a multi-agency approach and use of outreach services is a more helpful approach.

The government has said it will review the Act as part of its rough sleeping strategy. The Vagrancy Act was abolished in Scotland in 1982.

Bindmans partner Mike Schwarz, who contributed to the Crisis report, said: ‘I am really impressed by Crisis’ and others’ initiative to have the antiquated and socially regressive Vagrancy Act reviewed and repealed.

‘It is, literally a pre-Victorian piece of legislation, reflecting the outdated and oppressive views from a bygone era on a section of our community which needs support, rather than criminalisation. The report will, I hope, be the final step towards its abolition.’

The 1824 Act was originally introduced to make it easier for police to deal with destitute soldiers returning from the Napoleonic Wars. It makes it a criminal offence to ‘wander abroad’ or to be ‘in any public place, street, highway, court, or passage, to beg or gather alms’ in England and Wales.

According to a Freedom of Information request made by Crisis to the Ministry of Justice, there were 1,320 recorded prosecutions under the Act in 2018, an increase of 6% on the previous year, but less than half the number made five years ago. 

Between 2014 and 2018, rough sleeping in England rose by 70%.

Homeless people have reported being fined £100 and banned from town centres under the Act, risking prison if they are caught again. However, this can prevent those people using local services for rough sleepers. 

Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Charities , Community care
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll