header-logo header-logo

Calls for reform after latest big money divorce ruling

31 May 2007
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Family lawyers have backed calls by the Court of Appeal for a change in divorce laws following its judgment last week in Charman v Charman.

John Charman lost his bid to reduce on appeal the largest financial award on divorce in English legal history. He was ordered to pay his wife £48m from his estimated fortune of £131m.

James Freeman, solicitor at Speechly Bircham LLP, says that to succeed, Mr Charman had to at least dent one of two bastions of the law in this area.
“One is that all resources available to the parties…should be taken into account. The other is that…where there is more wealth around than the parties actually need, the approach is ‘50/50 or why not?’,” he says.
Simon Beccle, family law partner at Payne Hicks Beach, says: ”The judgment confirms that special contribution is still a reason for departing from an equal division of the assets in ‘big money’ cases and may give some comfort to wealthy spouses.”

Apart from the “special contribution” argument, Mr Charman

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The threat of section 21 ‘no fault’ eviction was banished this week, after the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 passed into law
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
back-to-top-scroll