header-logo header-logo

Calls for legislation on intimate image abuse

05 March 2025
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Privacy , Media
printer mail-detail
Possession of non-consensual intimate images (NCII) would become a criminal offence similar to that for child sexual abuse material, under proposals launched by a parliamentary committee.

The Women and Equalities Committee called on the government this week to amend the Crime and Policing Bill currently going through Parliament in order to create the offence. It warned this is necessary to force online platforms to delete the images—according to the Revenge Porn Helpline, about 10% of NCII are not removed and continue to be accessible in the UK, often hosted on sites based overseas including some dedicated to NCII abuse.

Currently, the Online Safety Act 2023 creates criminal offences related to the making and sharing of NCII. It gives Ofcom powers to impose fines and order services to take material down.

However, Ofcom’s powers are slow, says Sarah Owen MP, the committee’s chair, and ‘a legal gap remains. NCII can circulate online years after the image was first posted’.

As well as criminalising possession, the committee’s report, ‘Tackling non-consensual intimate image abuse’, published this week, calls for the establishment of an Online Safety Commission. This would be a statutory body akin to the eSafety Commission in Australia, with a focus on support for individuals. The commission would act on behalf of individuals who report NCII content, applying for and sending court orders demanding websites take down content or requiring perpetrators to pay compensation for harm caused.

Owen said: ‘The committee heard shocking evidence of [NCII’s] scale and impact, with a tenfold increase in just four years and more than 22,000 reported cases in 2024.

‘There is also an urgent need for courts to confiscate devices storing NCII content. There have been cases where, following the criminal justice process, perpetrators have had devices containing the NCII returned to them. This is harrowing for victims.’ 

Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Privacy , Media
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll