header-logo header-logo

26 November 2015
Issue: 7678 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Call for surrogacy reform

Report busts widely-held misconceptions of UK surrogacy

A major report has called for an overhaul of UK surrogacy law.

Surrogacy in the UK: Myth busting and reform aims to disprove many commonly-held misconceptions, eg that couples go abroad to find a surrogate and that UK surrogacy could be commercialised. On the contrary, it found that far fewer Britons seek surrogacy overseas than previously thought, that the vast majority of people use a surrogate in the UK, and that most UK surrogates receive less than £15,000 for out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

It calls for legal reform to: ensure the welfare and interests of surrogate-born children are the prime concern of the law; remove uncertainty over parenthood by introducing pre-authorisation of parental orders; broaden access to surrogacy; and guard the principle of altruistic surrogacy.

The report, published by Surrogacy UK, was written by legal academic Dr Kirsty Horsey.

Horsey says: “The concepts of family and reproduction have changed dramatically since surrogacy law was formed in this country, yet there seems to have been a reluctance to review what is now outdated legislation.”

Three-quarters of respondents to a survey for the report want legal reform to remove the legal uncertainty over parenthood at birth, and 69% were opposed to a surrogate being able to change their mind about giving a baby to its intended parents.

Louisa Ghevaert, surrogacy lawyer and partner at law firm Michelmores LLP, says: “This report shines a light on the reality of surrogacy in the UK.

“Surrogacy law is outdated and it leaves surrogate born children and their families in limbo. Legal reform is needed to provide much needed clarity to people undertaking surrogacy in the UK, to reflect their needs and wishes and to protect the welfare of surrogate born children.”

Issue: 7678 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll